linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-sysman: add support for alienware products

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <PH0PR19MB4988833112285DF244DAC99DE3682@PH0PR19MB4988.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:45:38 +0000
From: "Wang, Crag" <Crag.Wang@...l.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        Crag Wang
	<crag0715@...il.com>,
        "Ksr, Prasanth" <Prasanth.Ksr@...l.com>,
        "hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Dell Client Kernel
	<Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
	<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-sysman: add support for alienware
 products

>
> Would it perhaps make sense to be an && condition instead of remove the
> dmi_find_device() conditions?
>
> IE:
>
> if (!dmi_find_device() && !dmi_find_device() && !dmi_check_system())
>
> Then you can continue to cover anything that has been rebranded too.
>

I will do v2 to add the new string and remove the URL check to accommodate
the OEM use case.


Internal Use - Confidential