[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66A7418F-4989-4765-AC0F-1D23342C6950@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:16:56 +0000
From: Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
To: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Allison Henderson
<allison.henderson@...cle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"rds-devel@....oracle.com"
<rds-devel@....oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [MAINLINE 0/2] Enable DIM for legacy ULPs and use it in RDS
> On 24 Sep 2024, at 15:59, Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> 在 2024/9/24 14:54, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 09:58:24AM +0800, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>>> The users that I mentioned is not in the kernel tree.
>> And why do you think that would matter the slightest?
>
> I noticed that the same cq functions are used. And I also made tests with this patch series. Without this patch series, dim mechanism will not be invoked.
Christoph alluded to say: Do not modify the old cq_create_cq() code in order to support DIM, it is better to change the ULP to use ib_alloc_cq(), and get DIM enabled that way.
Thxs, Håkon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists