lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240925115823.1303019-91-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:51:50 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	nathan@...nel.org,
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.10 091/197] tools/nolibc: powerpc: limit stack-protector workaround to GCC

From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>

[ Upstream commit 1daea158d0aae0770371f3079305a29fdb66829e ]

As mentioned in the comment, the workaround for
__attribute__((no_stack_protector)) is only necessary on GCC.
Avoid applying the workaround on clang, as clang does not recognize
__attribute__((__optimize__)) and would fail.

Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240807-nolibc-llvm-v2-3-c20f2f5fc7c2@weissschuh.net
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h
index ac212e6185b26..41ebd394b90c7 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@
 	_ret;                                                                \
 })
 
-#ifndef __powerpc64__
+#if !defined(__powerpc64__) && !defined(__clang__)
 /* FIXME: For 32-bit PowerPC, with newer gcc compilers (e.g. gcc 13.1.0),
  * "omit-frame-pointer" fails with __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) but
  * works with __attribute__((__optimize__("-fno-stack-protector")))
-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ