| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240925121137.1307574-2-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:07:02 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Chih-Kang Chang <gary.chang@...ltek.com>,
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
kvalo@...nel.org,
terrelln@...com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 002/139] wifi: rtw89: avoid to add interface to list twice when SER
From: Chih-Kang Chang <gary.chang@...ltek.com>
[ Upstream commit 7dd5d2514a8ea58f12096e888b0bd050d7eae20a ]
If SER L2 occurs during the WoWLAN resume flow, the add interface flow
is triggered by ieee80211_reconfig(). However, due to
rtw89_wow_resume() return failure, it will cause the add interface flow
to be executed again, resulting in a double add list and causing a kernel
panic. Therefore, we have added a check to prevent double adding of the
list.
list_add double add: new=ffff99d6992e2010, prev=ffff99d6992e2010, next=ffff99d695302628.
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:37!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G W O 6.6.30-02659-gc18865c4dfbd #1 770df2933251a0e3c888ba69d1053a817a6376a7
Hardware name: HP Grunt/Grunt, BIOS Google_Grunt.11031.169.0 06/24/2021
Workqueue: events_freezable ieee80211_restart_work [mac80211]
RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid_or_report+0x5e/0xb0
Code: c7 74 18 48 39 ce 74 13 b0 01 59 5a 5e 5f 41 58 41 59 41 5a 5d e9 e2 d6 03 00 cc 48 c7 c7 8d 4f 17 83 48 89 c2 e8 02 c0 00 00 <0f> 0b 48 c7 c7 aa 8c 1c 83 e8 f4 bf 00 00 0f 0b 48 c7 c7 c8 bc 12
RSP: 0018:ffffa91b8007bc50 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000058 RBX: ffff99d6992e0900 RCX: a014d76c70ef3900
RDX: ffffa91b8007bae8 RSI: 00000000ffffdfff RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: ffffa91b8007bc88 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa91b8007bae0
R10: 00000000ffffdfff R11: ffffffff83a79800 R12: ffff99d695302060
R13: ffff99d695300900 R14: ffff99d6992e1be0 R15: ffff99d6992e2010
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff99d6aac00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000078fbdba43480 CR3: 000000010e464000 CR4: 00000000001506f0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die_body+0x1f/0x70
? die+0x3d/0x60
? do_trap+0xa4/0x110
? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x5e/0xb0
? do_error_trap+0x6d/0x90
? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x5e/0xb0
? handle_invalid_op+0x30/0x40
? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x5e/0xb0
? exc_invalid_op+0x3c/0x50
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x5e/0xb0
rtw89_ops_add_interface+0x309/0x310 [rtw89_core 7c32b1ee6854761c0321027c8a58c5160e41f48f]
drv_add_interface+0x5c/0x130 [mac80211 83e989e6e616bd5b4b8a2b0a9f9352a2c385a3bc]
ieee80211_reconfig+0x241/0x13d0 [mac80211 83e989e6e616bd5b4b8a2b0a9f9352a2c385a3bc]
? finish_wait+0x3e/0x90
? synchronize_rcu_expedited+0x174/0x260
? sync_rcu_exp_done_unlocked+0x50/0x50
? wake_bit_function+0x40/0x40
ieee80211_restart_work+0xf0/0x140 [mac80211 83e989e6e616bd5b4b8a2b0a9f9352a2c385a3bc]
process_scheduled_works+0x1e5/0x480
worker_thread+0xea/0x1e0
kthread+0xdb/0x110
? move_linked_works+0x90/0x90
? kthread_associate_blkcg+0xa0/0xa0
ret_from_fork+0x3b/0x50
? kthread_associate_blkcg+0xa0/0xa0
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
</TASK>
Modules linked in: dm_integrity async_xor xor async_tx lz4 lz4_compress zstd zstd_compress zram zsmalloc rfcomm cmac uinput algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg btusb btrtl iio_trig_hrtimer industrialio_sw_trigger btmtk industrialio_configfs btbcm btintel uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc iio_trig_sysfs videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common uvc snd_hda_codec_hdmi veth snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg acpi_als snd_hda_codec industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf snd_hwdep industrialio i2c_piix4 snd_hda_core designware_i2s ip6table_nat snd_soc_max98357a xt_MASQUERADE xt_cgroup snd_soc_acp_rt5682_mach fuse rtw89_8922ae(O) rtw89_8922a(O) rtw89_pci(O) rtw89_core(O) 8021q mac80211(O) bluetooth ecdh_generic ecc cfg80211 r8152 mii joydev
gsmi: Log Shutdown Reason 0x03
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Signed-off-by: Chih-Kang Chang <gary.chang@...ltek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240731070506.46100-4-pkshih@realtek.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c | 4 +++-
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/util.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
index 487d79938bc71..5b9de1f41dc78 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac80211.c
@@ -126,7 +126,9 @@ static int rtw89_ops_add_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
rtwvif->rtwdev = rtwdev;
rtwvif->roc.state = RTW89_ROC_IDLE;
rtwvif->offchan = false;
- list_add_tail(&rtwvif->list, &rtwdev->rtwvifs_list);
+ if (!rtw89_rtwvif_in_list(rtwdev, rtwvif))
+ list_add_tail(&rtwvif->list, &rtwdev->rtwvifs_list);
+
INIT_WORK(&rtwvif->update_beacon_work, rtw89_core_update_beacon_work);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rtwvif->roc.roc_work, rtw89_roc_work);
rtw89_leave_ps_mode(rtwdev);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/util.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/util.h
index e2ed4565025dd..d4ee9078a4f48 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/util.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/util.h
@@ -14,6 +14,24 @@
#define rtw89_for_each_rtwvif(rtwdev, rtwvif) \
list_for_each_entry(rtwvif, &(rtwdev)->rtwvifs_list, list)
+/* Before adding rtwvif to list, we need to check if it already exist, beacase
+ * in some case such as SER L2 happen during WoWLAN flow, calling reconfig
+ * twice cause the list to be added twice.
+ */
+static inline bool rtw89_rtwvif_in_list(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+ struct rtw89_vif *new)
+{
+ struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rtwdev->mutex);
+
+ rtw89_for_each_rtwvif(rtwdev, rtwvif)
+ if (rtwvif == new)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/* The result of negative dividend and positive divisor is undefined, but it
* should be one case of round-down or round-up. So, make it round-down if the
* result is round-up.
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists