linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 118/139] drm/amdgpu: fix unchecked return value warning for amdgpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240925121137.1307574-118-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:08:58 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tim Huang <tim.huang@....com>,
	Jesse Zhang <jesse.zhang@....com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	christian.koenig@....com,
	Xinhui.Pan@....com,
	airlied@...il.com,
	daniel@...ll.ch,
	Hawking.Zhang@....com,
	Jack.Xiao@....com,
	srinivasan.shanmugam@....com,
	lijo.lazar@....com,
	mario.limonciello@....com,
	Stanley.Yang@....com,
	tao.zhou1@....com,
	victorchengchi.lu@....com,
	amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 118/139] drm/amdgpu: fix unchecked return value warning for amdgpu_gfx

From: Tim Huang <tim.huang@....com>

[ Upstream commit c0277b9d7c2ee9ee5dbc948548984f0fbb861301 ]

This resolves the unchecded return value warning reported by Coverity.

Signed-off-by: Tim Huang <tim.huang@....com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Zhang <jesse.zhang@....com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
index 0ca51df46cc0d..e7b053898f9e9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
@@ -793,8 +793,11 @@ int amdgpu_gfx_ras_late_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct ras_common_if *r
 	int r;
 
 	if (amdgpu_ras_is_supported(adev, ras_block->block)) {
-		if (!amdgpu_persistent_edc_harvesting_supported(adev))
-			amdgpu_ras_reset_error_status(adev, AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__GFX);
+		if (!amdgpu_persistent_edc_harvesting_supported(adev)) {
+			r = amdgpu_ras_reset_error_status(adev, AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__GFX);
+			if (r)
+				return r;
+		}
 
 		r = amdgpu_ras_block_late_init(adev, ras_block);
 		if (r)
@@ -938,7 +941,10 @@ uint32_t amdgpu_kiq_rreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg)
 		pr_err("critical bug! too many kiq readers\n");
 		goto failed_unlock;
 	}
-	amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32);
+	r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32);
+	if (r)
+		goto failed_unlock;
+
 	amdgpu_ring_emit_rreg(ring, reg, reg_val_offs);
 	r = amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
 	if (r)
@@ -1004,7 +1010,10 @@ void amdgpu_kiq_wreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg, uint32_t v)
 	}
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
-	amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32);
+	r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32);
+	if (r)
+		goto failed_unlock;
+
 	amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, reg, v);
 	r = amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
 	if (r)
@@ -1040,6 +1049,7 @@ void amdgpu_kiq_wreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg, uint32_t v)
 
 failed_undo:
 	amdgpu_ring_undo(ring);
+failed_unlock:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
 failed_kiq_write:
 	dev_err(adev->dev, "failed to write reg:%x\n", reg);
-- 
2.43.0