[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0176da3b-e95c-ac75-a945-731dc74cb45d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 16:55:00 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>,
Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.11 145/244] ata: pata_serverworks: Do not use
the term blacklist
On 9/25/24 14:26, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
>
> [ Upstream commit 858048568c9e3887d8b19e101ee72f129d65cb15 ]
>
> Let's not use the term blacklist in the function
> serverworks_osb4_filter() documentation comment and rather simply refer
> to what that function looks at: the list of devices with groken UDMA5.
>
> While at it, also constify the values of the csb_bad_ata100 array.
>
> Of note is that all of this should probably be handled using libata
> quirk mechanism but it is unclear if these UDMA5 quirks are specific
> to this controller only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
[...]
Again, what does this fix? :-/
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists