[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce313c28-8b41-4d52-8a36-901ad5d6c899@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:02:34 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@....com>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] x86/pvh: Make 64bit PVH entry relocatable
On 9/25/24 02:28, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 16.09.24 10:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> x86 maintainers,
>>
>> are you going to pick this series up, or should I take it via the
>> Xen tree?
>
> I take the silence as a "its okay to go via the Xen tree".
Or, "most of us were traveling last week and in a bigger email hole than
normal". ;)
But, yeah, feel free to take this via the Xen tree. I just acked the
only one that's not quite Xen-specific.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists