[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6656171b-12d3-490b-b53c-f907b7454f99@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:16:28 +0800
From: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: phy: Add QMP UFS PHY comptible for
QCS8300
On 9/16/2024 10:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 02:56:16PM +0800, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>> From: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@...cinc.com>
>>
>> Document the QMP UFS PHY compatible for Qualcomm QCS8300 to support
>> physical layer functionality for UFS found on the SoC. Use fallback to
>> indicate the compatibility of the QMP UFS PHY on the QCS8300 with that
>> on the SA8775P.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - decoupled from the original series.
>> - Use fallback to indicate compatibility with SA8775P.
>> - typo fixup
>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904-qcs8300_initial_dtsi-v1-0-d0ea9afdc007@quicinc.com
>> ---
>> .../bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml | 46 ++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml
>> index f9cfbd0b2de6..626a2039e177 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml
>> @@ -15,26 +15,31 @@ description:
>>
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> - enum:
>> - - qcom,msm8996-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,msm8998-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sa8775p-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sc7180-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sc7280-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sc8180x-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sdm845-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sm6125-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sm6350-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sm7150-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sm8150-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sm8250-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sm8350-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sm8450-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sm8475-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sm8550-qmp-ufs-phy
>> - - qcom,sm8650-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + oneOf:
>> + - items:
>> + - enum:
>> + - qcom,qcs8300-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - const: qcom,sa8775p-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - enum:
>> + - qcom,msm8996-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,msm8998-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sa8775p-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sc7180-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sc7280-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sc8180x-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sdm845-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sm6125-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sm6350-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sm7150-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sm8150-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sm8250-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sm8350-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sm8450-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sm8475-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sm8550-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,sm8650-qmp-ufs-phy
>>
>> reg:
>> maxItems: 1
>> @@ -85,6 +90,7 @@ allOf:
>> contains:
>> enum:
>> - qcom,msm8998-qmp-ufs-phy
>> + - qcom,qcs8300-qmp-ufs-phy
>
> Not needed.
>
Well noted.
> BTW, please be sure you organize your patchsets per subsystem. IOW, that
> you do not split same subsystem bindings patches into separate
> patchsets.
>
Do you mean combine the binding of qmp-ufs-phy with ufs controller? I noticed
that this patch belongs to "GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK" subsystem and ufs controller
binding belongs to "UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST CONTROLLER DRIVER". If necessary,
we can pay attention to combine them next time
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thanks,
Jingyi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists