linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Rust for 6.12

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72m7ZcmQdq+D37N-bmH_JeFg7H+HUhJJnWTdCyZxn0hkMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 20:01:21 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, 
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, 
	Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Rust for 6.12

On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 7:46 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> That gets it building for me on x86-64, at least. But at the
> maintainer summit I think you said MODVERSIONS support is being worked
> on too, no?

Yeah:

    https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20240923181846.549877-22-samitolvanen@google.com/
    https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20240924212024.540574-1-mmaurer@google.com/

> On my arm64 box, Rust support is still disabled due to
> RUSTC_SUPPORTS_ARM64 not being true (which in turn seems to be due to
> SHADOW_CALL_STACK support, and that needs rust 18.2 which I don't
> have).

Yeah, Rust 1.82 is not released yet, it will be on 2024-10-17, i.e.
about 3 weeks, and then Fedora should have it soon after (~some days,
I think).

> Anyway, just a heads up that I think we'll have more "unintentional"
> Rust build test coverage this way.

That is great, thanks. I currently do defconfig + a few bits and
variations to cover the Rust code we have (to keep the CI time down)
-- I will start doing allmodconfigs for the next cycles then.

Cheers,
Miguel