lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b66264a9-2ff9-482a-96e0-453d55bc651c@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 17:37:30 -0700
From: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Sean Paul
	<sean@...rly.run>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        "David
 Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "Maarten
 Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard
	<mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, <quic_ebharadw@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/22] drm/msm/dpu: fill CRTC resources in dpu_crtc.c



On 9/24/2024 4:16 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:59:22PM GMT, Jessica Zhang wrote:
>> From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>>
>> Stop poking into CRTC state from dpu_encoder.c, fill CRTC HW resources
>> from dpu_crtc_assign_resources().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>> [quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com: cleaned up formatting]
>> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
>> [quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com: dropped clearing num_mixers in CRTC disable
>> path]
> 
> Same comment as before: the code is still there.

Hi Dmitry,

I thought the original comment was to move the dropping `num_mixers = 0` 
chunk from the previous patch to this one?

Sorry if I misunderstood.

Thanks,

Jessica Zhang

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c    | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 24 ++--------------------
>>   2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
>> index b918c80d30b3..d53e986eee54 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
>> @@ -1091,9 +1091,6 @@ static void dpu_crtc_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>   
>>   	dpu_core_perf_crtc_update(crtc, 0);
>>   
>> -	memset(cstate->mixers, 0, sizeof(cstate->mixers));
>> -	cstate->num_mixers = 0;
>> -
>>   	/* disable clk & bw control until clk & bw properties are set */
>>   	cstate->bw_control = false;
>>   	cstate->bw_split_vote = false;
>> @@ -1164,6 +1161,7 @@ static bool dpu_crtc_needs_dirtyfb(struct drm_crtc_state *cstate)
>>   }
>>   
>>   #define MAX_HDISPLAY_SPLIT 1080
>> +#define MAX_CHANNELS_PER_CRTC 2
>>   
>>   static struct msm_display_topology dpu_crtc_get_topology(
>>   		struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> @@ -1208,9 +1206,14 @@ static struct msm_display_topology dpu_crtc_get_topology(
>>   
>>   static int dpu_crtc_assign_resources(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>   {
>> +	struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_ctl[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_CRTC];
>> +	struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_lm[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_CRTC];
>> +	struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_dspp[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_CRTC];
>> +	int i, num_lm, num_ctl, num_dspp;
>>   	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms = _dpu_crtc_get_kms(crtc);
>>   	struct dpu_global_state *global_state;
>>   	struct msm_display_topology topology;
>> +	struct dpu_crtc_state *cstate;
>>   	int ret;
>>   
>>   	/*
>> @@ -1232,6 +1235,29 @@ static int dpu_crtc_assign_resources(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_crtc_stat
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		return ret;
>>   
>> +	cstate = to_dpu_crtc_state(crtc_state);
>> +
>> +	num_ctl = dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state,
>> +						crtc, DPU_HW_BLK_CTL, hw_ctl,
>> +						ARRAY_SIZE(hw_ctl));
>> +	num_lm = dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state,
>> +					       crtc, DPU_HW_BLK_LM, hw_lm,
>> +					       ARRAY_SIZE(hw_lm));
>> +	num_dspp = dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state,
>> +						 crtc, DPU_HW_BLK_DSPP, hw_dspp,
>> +						 ARRAY_SIZE(hw_dspp));
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < num_lm; i++) {
>> +		int ctl_idx = (i < num_ctl) ? i : (num_ctl-1);
>> +
>> +		cstate->mixers[i].hw_lm = to_dpu_hw_mixer(hw_lm[i]);
>> +		cstate->mixers[i].lm_ctl = to_dpu_hw_ctl(hw_ctl[ctl_idx]);
>> +		if (i < num_dspp)
>> +			cstate->mixers[i].hw_dspp = to_dpu_hw_dspp(hw_dspp[i]);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	cstate->num_mixers = num_lm;
>> +
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>> index ada9119326ca..36b677cf9c7a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>> @@ -1049,14 +1049,11 @@ static void dpu_encoder_virt_atomic_mode_set(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc,
>>   	struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc;
>>   	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>>   	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>> -	struct dpu_crtc_state *cstate;
>>   	struct dpu_global_state *global_state;
>>   	struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_pp[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>>   	struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_ctl[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>> -	struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_lm[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>> -	struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_dspp[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC] = { NULL };
>>   	struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_dsc[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>> -	int num_lm, num_ctl, num_pp, num_dsc;
>> +	int num_pp, num_dsc;
>>   	unsigned int dsc_mask = 0;
>>   	int i;
>>   
>> @@ -1083,13 +1080,8 @@ static void dpu_encoder_virt_atomic_mode_set(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc,
>>   	num_pp = dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state,
>>   		drm_enc->crtc, DPU_HW_BLK_PINGPONG, hw_pp,
>>   		ARRAY_SIZE(hw_pp));
>> -	num_ctl = dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state,
>> -		drm_enc->crtc, DPU_HW_BLK_CTL, hw_ctl, ARRAY_SIZE(hw_ctl));
>> -	num_lm = dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state,
>> -		drm_enc->crtc, DPU_HW_BLK_LM, hw_lm, ARRAY_SIZE(hw_lm));
>>   	dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state,
>> -		drm_enc->crtc, DPU_HW_BLK_DSPP, hw_dspp,
>> -		ARRAY_SIZE(hw_dspp));
>> +			drm_enc->crtc, DPU_HW_BLK_CTL, hw_ctl, ARRAY_SIZE(hw_ctl));
> 
> Please don't mix reindentation with the actual changes. It makes it
> harder to read.
> 
>>   
>>   	for (i = 0; i < MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC; i++)
>>   		dpu_enc->hw_pp[i] = i < num_pp ? to_dpu_hw_pingpong(hw_pp[i])
>> @@ -1115,18 +1107,6 @@ static void dpu_encoder_virt_atomic_mode_set(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc,
>>   		dpu_enc->cur_master->hw_cdm = hw_cdm ? to_dpu_hw_cdm(hw_cdm) : NULL;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	cstate = to_dpu_crtc_state(crtc_state);
>> -
>> -	for (i = 0; i < num_lm; i++) {
>> -		int ctl_idx = (i < num_ctl) ? i : (num_ctl-1);
>> -
>> -		cstate->mixers[i].hw_lm = to_dpu_hw_mixer(hw_lm[i]);
>> -		cstate->mixers[i].lm_ctl = to_dpu_hw_ctl(hw_ctl[ctl_idx]);
>> -		cstate->mixers[i].hw_dspp = to_dpu_hw_dspp(hw_dspp[i]);
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	cstate->num_mixers = num_lm;
>> -
>>   	for (i = 0; i < dpu_enc->num_phys_encs; i++) {
>>   		struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys = dpu_enc->phys_encs[i];
>>   
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
> 
> -- 
> With best wishes
> Dmitry


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ