[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240925000622.1972325-3-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:06:04 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: void@...ifault.com
Cc: kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sched-ext@...a.com,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] sched_ext: Allow only user DSQs for scx_bpf_consume(), scx_bpf_dsq_nr_queued() and bpf_iter_scx_dsq_new()
SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL is special in that it can't be used as a priority queue and
is consumed implicitly, but all BPF DSQ related kfuncs could be used on it.
SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL will be split per-node for scalability and those operations
won't make sense anymore. Disallow SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL on scx_bpf_consume(),
scx_bpf_dsq_nr_queued() and bpf_iter_scx_dsq_new(). This means that
SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL can only be used as a dispatch target from BPF schedulers.
With scx_flatcg, which was using SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL as the fallback DSQ,
updated, this shouldn't affect any schedulers.
This leaves find_dsq_for_dispatch() the only user of find_non_local_dsq().
Open code and remove find_non_local_dsq().
Signed-off-by: tejun heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index d74d1fe06999..ed2b914c42d1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -1808,16 +1808,6 @@ static struct scx_dispatch_q *find_user_dsq(u64 dsq_id)
return rhashtable_lookup_fast(&dsq_hash, &dsq_id, dsq_hash_params);
}
-static struct scx_dispatch_q *find_non_local_dsq(u64 dsq_id)
-{
- lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_any_held());
-
- if (dsq_id == SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL)
- return &scx_dsq_global;
- else
- return find_user_dsq(dsq_id);
-}
-
static struct scx_dispatch_q *find_dsq_for_dispatch(struct rq *rq, u64 dsq_id,
struct task_struct *p)
{
@@ -1835,7 +1825,11 @@ static struct scx_dispatch_q *find_dsq_for_dispatch(struct rq *rq, u64 dsq_id,
return &cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.local_dsq;
}
- dsq = find_non_local_dsq(dsq_id);
+ if (dsq_id == SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL)
+ dsq = &scx_dsq_global;
+ else
+ dsq = find_user_dsq(dsq_id);
+
if (unlikely(!dsq)) {
scx_ops_error("non-existent DSQ 0x%llx for %s[%d]",
dsq_id, p->comm, p->pid);
@@ -6176,7 +6170,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc bool scx_bpf_consume(u64 dsq_id)
flush_dispatch_buf(dspc->rq);
- dsq = find_non_local_dsq(dsq_id);
+ dsq = find_user_dsq(dsq_id);
if (unlikely(!dsq)) {
scx_ops_error("invalid DSQ ID 0x%016llx", dsq_id);
return false;
@@ -6497,7 +6491,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_dsq_nr_queued(u64 dsq_id)
goto out;
}
} else {
- dsq = find_non_local_dsq(dsq_id);
+ dsq = find_user_dsq(dsq_id);
if (dsq) {
ret = READ_ONCE(dsq->nr);
goto out;
@@ -6546,7 +6540,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_scx_dsq_new(struct bpf_iter_scx_dsq *it, u64 dsq_id,
if (flags & ~__SCX_DSQ_ITER_USER_FLAGS)
return -EINVAL;
- kit->dsq = find_non_local_dsq(dsq_id);
+ kit->dsq = find_user_dsq(dsq_id);
if (!kit->dsq)
return -ENOENT;
--
2.46.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists