[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <172737172354.3854998.16269602769912786358.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:28:57 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf symbol: Do not fixup end address of labels
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:42:08 -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> When it loads symbols from an ELF file, it loads label symbols which is
> 0 size. Sometimes it has the same address with other symbols and might
> shadow the original symbols because it fixes up the size of the symbol.
>
> For example, in my system __do_softirq is shadowed and only accepts the
> __softirqentry_text_start instead. But it should accept __do_softirq.
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists