linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7 v3] Make wake_up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <172738528850.470955.17847209131107637985@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 07:14:48 +1000
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
 "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 v3] Make wake_up_{bit,var} less fragile

On Fri, 27 Sep 2024, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25 2024 at 15:31, NeilBrown wrote:
> >  this is a revised set of patches for cleaning up wake_up_bit and
> >  wake_up_var and related.  They are the result of more proof reading,
> >  and of trying to make use of the new interfaces anywhere in the kernel
> >  where these interfaces are used.
> 
> Now I have two variants of a v3 patch set in my inbox. One with 7 and
> one with 8 patches. Both sent within a couple of minutes....
> 
> Confused.

Arg - sorry about that.  I realise now what went wrong.

Please use the one with 7 patches.  The first patch in the set of 8 has
already been accepted by Jens for the block tree and has now been merged
(as of Wednesday afternoon).

Thanks,
NeilBrown