[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3938446.fW5hKsROvD@phil>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:24:49 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Move L3 cache under CPUs in RK356x SoC dtsi
Am Donnerstag, 26. September 2024, 09:49:18 CEST schrieb Dragan Simic:
> Move the "l3_cache" node under the "cpus" node in the dtsi file for Rockchip
> RK356x SoCs. There's no need for this cache node to be at the higher level.
>
> Fixes: 8612169a05c5 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for RK356x")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
I think the commit message needs a bit more rationale on why this is a
stable-worthy fix. Because from the move and commit message it reads
like a styling choice ;-) .
I do agree that it makes more sense as child of cpus, but the commit
message should also elaborate on why that would matter for stable.
Heiko
> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi
> index 4690be841a1c..9f7136e5d553 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi
> @@ -113,19 +113,19 @@ cpu3: cpu@300 {
> d-cache-sets = <128>;
> next-level-cache = <&l3_cache>;
> };
> - };
>
> - /*
> - * There are no private per-core L2 caches, but only the
> - * L3 cache that appears to the CPU cores as L2 caches
> - */
> - l3_cache: l3-cache {
> - compatible = "cache";
> - cache-level = <2>;
> - cache-unified;
> - cache-size = <0x80000>;
> - cache-line-size = <64>;
> - cache-sets = <512>;
> + /*
> + * There are no private per-core L2 caches, but only the
> + * L3 cache that appears to the CPU cores as L2 caches
> + */
> + l3_cache: l3-cache {
> + compatible = "cache";
> + cache-level = <2>;
> + cache-unified;
> + cache-size = <0x80000>;
> + cache-line-size = <64>;
> + cache-sets = <512>;
> + };
> };
>
> cpu0_opp_table: opp-table-0 {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists