[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL3q7H4prrKHKP_Ls-eYhiHtp4x84+d2W189eV4R+KF4V89yGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 15:09:16 +0100
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...nel.org>
To: Riyan Dhiman <riyandhiman14@...il.com>
Cc: clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: add missing NULL check in btrfs_free_tree_block()
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 2:57 PM Riyan Dhiman <riyandhiman14@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > If that happens we want it to be noisy so that it gets reported and we
> > look at it.
> > Letting a NULL pointer dereference happen is one way of getting our attention.
> >
> > O more gentle and explicit way would be to have a: ASSERT(bg != NULL);
>
> I am wondering whether it would be better to have an ASSERT statement here, as you
> suggested, or use a BUG_ON instead.
Please no, we're trying to get rid of all BUG_ON()s in the code base,
and replace them either with proper error handling or an ASSERT, or
both sometimes since CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT is not enabled by default in
some distros (we say in kconfig that it's meant only for developers).
>
> I haven't personally encountered a null pointer dereference issue in a live kernel
> environment, so I'm not sure how the kernel behaves in such a scenario. However, it
> seems wrong to leave it unhandled as it currently is.
Just add a:
if (WARN_ON(!bg)) {
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, -ENOENT);
btrfs_err(fs_info, "block group not found for extent buffer %llu
generation %llu root %llu transaction %llu",
buf->start, btrfs_header_generation(buf), root_id,
trans->transid);
return -ENOENT;
}
Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Riyan Dhiman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists