| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240926161726.3945f835@foz.lan>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:19:15 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>, Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Ani Sinha <anisinha@...hat.com>,
Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu1@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<qemu-arm@...gnu.org>, <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] acpi/ghes: make the GHES record generation more
generic
Em Thu, 26 Sep 2024 13:00:56 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> escreveu:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 06:04:14 +0200
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Split the code into separate functions to allow using the
> > common CPER filling code by different error sources.
> >
> > The generic code was moved to ghes_record_cper_errors(),
> > and ghes_gen_err_data_uncorrectable_recoverable() now contains
> > only a logic to fill GEGB part of the record.
> >
> > The remaining code to generate a memory error now belongs to
> > acpi_ghes_record_errors() function.
> >
> > A further patch will give it a better name.
>
> That bit is fine, I'm less sure about
> ghes_gen_err_data_uncorrectable_recoverable()
> Maybe you refactor that later, but I'd suggest doing so in this
> patch to make it
> ghes_gen_data() with the uncorrectable and recoverable bits
> passed in as parameters.
For now, no need. When using the error injection script, such
function is not used. The script can already play with what's
defined there.
Besides that, I tried to generalize it, but it is not trivial,
as passing some things as parameter is really hard. So, instead,
I opted to keep the code as-is. It can be changed later once we
add internal events that require a different setting than what
we have with ARMv8 memory errors via SEA.
>
> Jonathan
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > hw/acpi/ghes.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > include/hw/acpi/ghes.h | 3 ++
> > 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/ghes.c b/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> > index 340a0263faf8..307b5a41d539 100644
> > --- a/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> > +++ b/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> > @@ -181,51 +181,30 @@ static void acpi_ghes_build_append_mem_cper(GArray *table,
> > build_append_int_noprefix(table, 0, 7);
> > }
> >
> > -static int acpi_ghes_record_mem_error(uint64_t error_block_address,
> > - uint64_t error_physical_addr)
> > +static void
> > +ghes_gen_err_data_uncorrectable_recoverable(GArray *block,
> > + const uint8_t *section_type,
> > + int data_length)
> > {
>
> That's an ugly name . Suggestion below on instead passing parameters
> for the uncorrectable and recoverable parts and amking this
> ghes_gen_err_data()
>
> > - GArray *block;
> > -
> > - /* Memory Error Section Type */
> > - const uint8_t uefi_cper_mem_sec[] =
> > - UUID_LE(0xA5BC1114, 0x6F64, 0x4EDE, 0xB8, 0x63, 0x3E, 0x83, \
> > - 0xED, 0x7C, 0x83, 0xB1);
> > -
> > /* invalid fru id: ACPI 4.0: 17.3.2.6.1 Generic Error Data,
> > * Table 17-13 Generic Error Data Entry
> > */
> > QemuUUID fru_id = {};
> > - uint32_t data_length;
> >
> > - block = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */, 1);
> > -
> > - /* This is the length if adding a new generic error data entry*/
> > - data_length = ACPI_GHES_DATA_LENGTH + ACPI_GHES_MEM_CPER_LENGTH;
> > /*
> > - * It should not run out of the preallocated memory if adding a new generic
> > - * error data entry
> > + * Calculate the size with this block. No need to check for
> > + * too big CPER, as CPER size is checked at ghes_record_cper_errors()
> > */
> > - assert((data_length + ACPI_GHES_GESB_SIZE) <=
> > - ACPI_GHES_MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH);
> > + data_length += ACPI_GHES_GESB_SIZE;
> >
> > /* Build the new generic error status block header */
> > acpi_ghes_generic_error_status(block, ACPI_GEBS_UNCORRECTABLE,
> > 0, 0, data_length, ACPI_CPER_SEV_RECOVERABLE);
> >
> > /* Build this new generic error data entry header */
> > - acpi_ghes_generic_error_data(block, uefi_cper_mem_sec,
> > + acpi_ghes_generic_error_data(block, section_type,
> > ACPI_CPER_SEV_RECOVERABLE, 0, 0,
> > ACPI_GHES_MEM_CPER_LENGTH, fru_id, 0);
> Maybe should just pass in ACPI_CPER_SEV_RECOVERABLE
> and ACPI_GEBS_UNCORRECTABLE in parameters.
>
> Main advantage being that should allow reuse for other combinations
> and it gets rid of the nasty function name!
>
> > -
> > - /* Build the memory section CPER for above new generic error data entry */
> > - acpi_ghes_build_append_mem_cper(block, error_physical_addr);
> > -
> > - /* Write the generic error data entry into guest memory */
> > - cpu_physical_memory_write(error_block_address, block->data, block->len);
> > -
> > - g_array_free(block, true);
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -399,14 +378,19 @@ void acpi_ghes_add_fw_cfg(AcpiGhesState *ags, FWCfgState *s,
> > ags->present = true;
> > }
> >
> > -int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint16_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address)
> > +void ghes_record_cper_errors(const void *cper, size_t len,
> > + uint16_t source_id, Error **errp)
> > {
>
> > - return ret;
> > + read_ack_register = cpu_to_le64(0);
> > + /*
> > + * Clear the Read Ack Register, OSPM will write it to 1 when
> > + * it acknowledges this error.
> > + */
>
> Indent issue.
>
> > + cpu_physical_memory_write(read_ack_register_addr,
> > + &read_ack_register, sizeof(uint64_t));
> > +
> > + /* Write the generic error data entry into guest memory */
> > + cpu_physical_memory_write(error_block_addr, cper, len);
> > +
> > + return;
> > +}
>
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists