[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240926144159.GF11458@google.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 23:41:59 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [next-20240925] possible circular locking: uart vs kmemleak
On (24/09/26 15:32), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2024-09-26 13:07:15, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Ran into the following issue today. It's sort of interesting, not sure
> > what even to do about it. The
> >
> > uart -> tty -> mm /* kmalloc -> kmemleak */
> >
> > chain looks problematic, it certainly overlaps with
> >
> > mm -> printk -> uart /* which can kmalloc and re-enter mm -> kmemleak? */
>
> I believe that it will get solved by the uart console driver
> conversion to nbcon. I should remove the path:
>
> printk -> uart
>
> or more precisely, it should remove the path:
>
> console_owner --> &port_lock_key
>
> The patchset with the uart 8250 console driver conversion is still
> pending a review, see the last version at
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913140538.221708-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de
It does fix the issue for me, you are right. Thanks for the pointers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists