linux-kernel - [PATCHv2] cpufreq/schedutil: Only bind threads if needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a4a70646-98a4-4b85-955e-62d66ba68927@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:59:16 +0100
From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>,
 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 linux-pm <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
 Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
Subject: [PATCHv2] cpufreq/schedutil: Only bind threads if needed

Remove the unconditional binding of sugov kthreads to the affected CPUs
if the cpufreq driver indicates that updates can happen from any CPU.
This allows userspace to set affinities to either save power (waking up
bigger CPUs on HMP can be expensive) or increasing performance (by
letting the utilized CPUs run without preemption of the sugov kthread).

Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
---
- v2: Add comment for the dl_task_check_affinity return (Juri)
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/480f2140-ea59-4e1d-a68d-18cbcec10941@arm.com/

 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +++++-
 kernel/sched/syscalls.c          | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index c6ba15388ea7..10faab849a3e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -691,7 +691,11 @@ static int sugov_kthread_create(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
 	}

 	sg_policy->thread = thread;
-	kthread_bind_mask(thread, policy->related_cpus);
+	if (policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu)
+		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(thread, policy->related_cpus);
+	else
+		kthread_bind_mask(thread, policy->related_cpus);
+
 	init_irq_work(&sg_policy->irq_work, sugov_irq_work);
 	mutex_init(&sg_policy->work_lock);

diff --git a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
index aa70beee9895..2ef1cb8626bc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
@@ -1172,6 +1172,13 @@ int dl_task_check_affinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask)
 	if (!task_has_dl_policy(p) || !dl_bandwidth_enabled())
 		return 0;

+	/*
+	 * The special/sugov task isn't part of regular bandwidth/admission
+	 * control so let userspace change affinities.
+	 */
+	if (dl_entity_is_special(&p->dl))
+		return 0;
+
 	/*
 	 * Since bandwidth control happens on root_domain basis,
 	 * if admission test is enabled, we only admit -deadline
-- 
2.34.1