[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0c4ba44-8cd3-419e-89cc-0c9cbfcbfda5@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 20:16:08 +0800
From: Tingguo Cheng <quic_tingguoc@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: <kernel@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>,
<quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: power: qcom,rpmpd: document qcs615 RPMh
power domains
On 9/20/2024 9:15 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/09/2024 06:08, Tingguo Cheng wrote:
>> Add compatible string for the RPMh power domains on qcs615 platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tingguo Cheng <quic_tingguoc@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>
> You sent within 30 minutes two independent patchsets touching the same
> part of code, so you knew it will lead to conflicts. I don't get how you
> imagine this to be applied. I suggest combining patchsets in such case.
I created a new patchset by combining the two patchsets into one to
resolve the conflicts.
20240927-add_qcs615_qcs8300_powerdomains_driver_support-v2-0-18c030ad7b68@...cinc.com
|
|<--Patchset 1:Current patchset.
|<--Patchset
2:https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240920-add_qcs8300_powerdomains_driver_support-v1-0-96a2a08841da@quicinc.com
>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
--
Thank you & BRs
Tingguo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists