linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 1/1] platform/x86/tuxedo: Add virtual LampArray for TUXEDO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240927124152.139099-1-wse@tuxedocomputers.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 14:41:51 +0200
From: Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>
To: 
Cc: bentiss@...nel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	hdegoede@...hat.com,
	jelle@...aa.nl,
	jikos@...nel.org,
	lee@...nel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com,
	ojeda@...nel.org,
	onitake@...il.com,
	pavel@....cz,
	cs@...edo.de
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] platform/x86/tuxedo: Add virtual LampArray for TUXEDO

Hi,
first revision integrating Armins feedback.

Stuff I did not yet change and did not comment on previously:
- Still have to ask Christoffer why the mutex is required
- Still using acpi_size instad of size_t in the util functions, because the value is put directly into a struct using acpi_size
- Error messages for __wmi_method_acpi_object_out still in that method because they reference method internal variables

Let me know if my reasoning is flawed

Kind regards,
Werner