[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240927163423.GG967758@unreal>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 19:34:23 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vfs netfs
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 09:01:19AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Do you have fixes for the following issues reported for series?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240923183432.1876750-1-chantr4@gmail.com/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/4b5621958a758da830c1cf09c6f6893aed371f9d.camel@gmail.com/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240924094809.GA1182241@unreal/
>
> I'm working on a fix for the third one at the moment, I think it's the read
> version of the write fix I posted previously:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/2050099.1727359110@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
>
> I'm looking to see if I can make a general solution that abstracts out the
> buffer handling for both as we're early in the cycle.
I hope that you mean that we have plenty of time before the merge window ends.
Otherwise, it will be very inconvenient to open official -next/-rc branches,
based on -rc1, remembering to revert so many commits.
It is better to have fast fixes and then work on improving them without
worrying about time frames.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists