[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240927125932.1cbf7e18@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 12:59:32 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the ftrace tree
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 07:54:39 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> commits (but the same patches):
>
> 1a41e44aaf63 ("tracepoint: Support iterating over tracepoints on modules")
> 3c842de2d916 ("sefltests/tracing: Add a test for tracepoint events on modules")
> 4ca74b253b11 ("tracepoint: Support iterating tracepoints in a loading module")
> 59c9f2923c04 ("tracing/fprobe: Support raw tracepoints on future loaded modules")
> 8e327678a908 ("kprobes: Remove obsoleted declaration for init_test_probes")
> c37e4bc7f70a ("tracing/fprobe: Support raw tracepoint events on modules")
>
Hmm, seems that Masami rebased his for-next branch. I just updated the
tracing for-next tree. They should have the same commits again.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists