[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <172745629958.248053.5554393032064276229.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:59:10 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test: Ignore security failures in all PMU test
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 10:30:13 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Refactor code to have some more error diagnosis on traps, etc. and to
> do less work on each line. Add an ignore situation for security failures.
>
>
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists