lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <PAXPR04MB8510FB983338827ABBE896F088752@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 01:35:38 +0000
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Claudiu Manoil
	<claudiu.manoil@....com>, "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
	"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>, "hawk@...nel.org"
	<hawk@...nel.org>, "john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "bpf@...r.kernel.org"
	<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net 2/3] net: enetc: fix the issues of XDP_REDIRECT
 feature

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> Sent: 2024年9月27日 22:42
> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org;
> pabeni@...hat.com; Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>;
> ast@...nel.org; daniel@...earbox.net; hawk@...nel.org;
> john.fastabend@...il.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; bpf@...r.kernel.org; stable@...r.kernel.org;
> imx@...ts.linux.dev
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] net: enetc: fix the issues of XDP_REDIRECT feature
> 
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 04:41:03PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> > @@ -2251,7 +2261,16 @@ static void enetc_disable_txbdr(struct enetc_hw
> *hw, struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring)
> >  	enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_TBMR, 0);
> >  }
> >
> > -static void enetc_disable_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> > +static void enetc_disable_rx_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> > +{
> > +	struct enetc_hw *hw = &priv->si->hw;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_rings; i++)
> > +		enetc_disable_rxbdr(hw, priv->rx_ring[i]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void enetc_disable_tx_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> >  {
> >  	struct enetc_hw *hw = &priv->si->hw;
> >  	int i;
> > @@ -2259,8 +2278,6 @@ static void enetc_disable_bdrs(struct
> enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> >  	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_rings; i++)
> >  		enetc_disable_txbdr(hw, priv->tx_ring[i]);
> >
> 
> Please do not leave a blank line here. In the git tree after applying
> this patch, that blank line appears at the end of enetc_disable_tx_bdrs().
> 
Thanks for reminder, it's weird that the checkpatch.pl did not raise a
warning here.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ