linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: Add kmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQLeARMvSqg0aqgBS0vncV-m6e+sM9C_Ox0r3SL1=GpRgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 10:00:56 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, 
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, 
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, 
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, 
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, 
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, 
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, 
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: Add kmem_cache iterator and kfunc (v2)

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 11:41 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm proposing a new iterator and a kfunc for the slab memory allocator
> to get information of each kmem_cache like in /proc/slabinfo or
> /sys/kernel/slab in more flexible way.
>
> v2 changes)

The subject is confusing CI and human readers.
Please use [PATCH v3 bpf-next ..] in the future.

Also note that RFC patches are never going to be applied and they are
ignored by BPF CI.
If you want things to land then drop the RFC tag.