[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51a87d3e-7a9c-4709-ab64-d869dca28b0a@denx.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 20:47:36 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...electronics.com,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] soc: imx8m: Probe the SoC driver as platform
driver
On 9/28/24 12:27 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
[...]
>>> I'm glad it's working for you, but I think there might still be a race
>>> that you are just lucky enough to not hit. I think you still need to
>>> fix up drivers/base/soc.c to return -EPROBE_DEFER when
>>> soc_device_match() is called but soc_bus_type has no devices
>>> registered. That way any drivers that try to use that API will defer
>>> probe until this device gets to probe.
>>
>> soc_device_match() returns a pointer to soc_device_attribute or NULL, do
>> you have some other function in mind ?
>
> No, I'm talking about the same function. I'm asking to change it to
> return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER) instead
> of NULL if no soc device has been registered yet.
>
> And you'll also go change all the drivers that use that API and are on
> the IMX boards supported by this soc driver, to handle the
> -EPROBE_DEFER correctly.
>
> And this error will only get returned for boards that do async probing
> and using a platform device to register the soc device. So it's
> not going to break everyone if you do this change.
It seems the imx8m has no users of this, so I created a local patch, but
I'll send a V4 of this series first.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists