[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DB9PR04MB9452A0E23FD29D7A8DB17DECF4752@DB9PR04MB9452.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 02:34:21 +0000
From: Sandor Yu <sandor.yu@....com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Maxime Ripard
<mripard@...nel.org>
CC: "andrzej.hajda@...el.com" <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
"neil.armstrong@...aro.org" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, "jonas@...boo.se" <jonas@...boo.se>,
"jernej.skrabec@...il.com" <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, "airlied@...il.com"
<airlied@...il.com>, "daniel@...ll.ch" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>, "s.hauer@...gutronix.de"
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>, "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, "kernel@...gutronix.de"
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, Oliver Brown
<oliver.brown@....com>, "alexander.stein@...tq-group.com"
<alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>, "sam@...nborg.org" <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 4/8] drm: bridge: Cadence: Add MHDP8501 DP/HDMI driver
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for your comments,
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 12:16:27PM GMT, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:36:49PM GMT, Sandor Yu wrote:
> > > +static int cdns_mhdp8501_read_hpd(struct cdns_mhdp8501_device
> > > +*mhdp) {
> > > + u8 status;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&mhdp_mailbox_mutex);
> > > +
> > > + ret = cdns_mhdp_mailbox_send(&mhdp->base,
> MB_MODULE_ID_GENERAL,
> > > + GENERAL_GET_HPD_STATE, 0,
> NULL);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto err_get_hpd;
> > > +
> > > + ret = cdns_mhdp_mailbox_recv_header(&mhdp->base,
> MB_MODULE_ID_GENERAL,
> > > + GENERAL_GET_HPD_STATE,
> > > + sizeof(status));
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto err_get_hpd;
> > > +
> > > + ret = cdns_mhdp_mailbox_recv_data(&mhdp->base, &status,
> sizeof(status));
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto err_get_hpd;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_unlock(&mhdp_mailbox_mutex);
> >
> > That's better I guess, but it's still not a good API design. If you
> > can't have concurrent accesses, then cdns_mhdp_mailbox_send et al.
> > should take the mutex themselves.
>
> I think that a proper API might be:
>
> int cdns_mhdp_mailbox_send_recv(struct cdns_mhdp_device *mhdp,
> u8 module_id, u8 opcode,
> u16 size, const u8 *message,
> u16 buf_size, u8 *buf);
>
> Internally it should take the lock, exchange the data, then return.
>
Thank you for your great suggestion. It seems like this should be able to solve the current problem.
I need to check each existing FW access functions one by one to see if they can all work under this API function.
B.R
Sandor
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists