[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240929212122.701125-1-paulk@sys-base.io>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 23:21:22 +0200
From: Paul Kocialkowski <paulk@...-base.io>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Paul Kocialkowski <contact@...lk.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: atags: Be silent about missing ATAGs
From: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@...lk.fr>
While the ATAGs functionality is still available in the kernel, it has
been deprecated for a long time already and probably has very few users
left.
Stop printing a message when ATAGs are not found since this is now the
situation most users will expect.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@...lk.fr>
---
arch/arm/kernel/atags_proc.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/atags_proc.c b/arch/arm/kernel/atags_proc.c
index cd09f8ab93e3..6643fffecfb7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/atags_proc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/atags_proc.c
@@ -41,10 +41,8 @@ static int __init init_atags_procfs(void)
struct buffer *b;
size_t size;
- if (tag->hdr.tag != ATAG_CORE) {
- pr_info("No ATAGs?\n");
+ if (tag->hdr.tag != ATAG_CORE)
return -EINVAL;
- }
for (; tag->hdr.size; tag = tag_next(tag))
;
--
2.46.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists