[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240930144328.51098-1-trintaeoitogc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:43:26 -0300
From: Guilherme Giacomo Simoes <trintaeoitogc@...il.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org,
ojeda@...nel.org,
alex.gaynor@...il.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com,
gary@...yguo.net,
bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com,
benno.lossin@...ton.me,
aliceryhl@...gle.com,
mcgrof@...nel.org,
russ.weight@...ux.dev,
dakr@...hat.com,
a.hindborg@...nel.org
Cc: Guilherme Giacomo Simoes <trintaeoitogc@...il.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/1] rust: device: rename "Device::from_raw()"
Why did I make this change?
This function "Device::from_raw()" increments the refcount by this
command "bindings::get_device(prt)". This can be confused because the
function Arc::from_raw() from the standard library, doesn't increment
the refcount.
This discussion is in
https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/291566-Library/topic/Inconsistency.20of.20.60from_raw.60.2E
The options can be:
1) Rename the function for don't make confusing with the
Arc::from_raw().
2) Remove this function and use the unsafe { Device::as_ref(ptr)
}.into() when I need the get pointer for the device.
Proposed solution
I like the first option. Because, how was will commented by Boqun Feng ,
when the people write the "unsafe { Device::as_ref(ptr) }.into()" again,
again and again... inevitably anybody will create a help function for
this.
Then I think that we should rename this function for
Device::get_from_raw() or maybe Device::get_device() and I like more of
the second option because, this will be equal the get_device() function
that already exists in .c code.
How do I test this:
I create this simple file in sample/rust/device.rs
""""""""
use kernel::device::Device;
use kernel::prelude::*;
use kernel::types::ARef;
module! {
type: DeviceTest,
name: "device_test",
author: "Test device",
description: "A simple module for test device",
license: "GPL",
}
struct DeviceTest;
impl kernel::Module for DeviceTest {
fn init(_module: &'static ThisModule) -> Result<Self> {
pr_info!("initial device test");
let device = create_and_get_device();
pr_info!("device created");
Ok(DeviceTest)
}
}
impl Drop for DeviceTest {
fn drop(&mut self) {
pr_info!("bye bye driver test");
}
}
fn create_and_get_device() -> ARef<Device> {
let device = unsafe { Device::get_device(core::ptr::null_mut()) };
device
}
""""""""
I set this in Kconfig
diff --git a/samples/rust/Kconfig b/samples/rust/Kconfig
index b0f74a81c8f9..7779969e7dd6 100644
--- a/samples/rust/Kconfig
+++ b/samples/rust/Kconfig
@@ -37,4 +37,9 @@ config SAMPLE_RUST_HOSTPROGS
If unsure, say N.
+config SAMPLE_DEVICE_TEST
+ tristate "Device test"
+ help
+ This option is for device test
+
endif # SAMPLES_RUST
and in Makefile
diff --git a/samples/rust/Makefile b/samples/rust/Makefile
index 03086dabbea4..85a8b30100e7 100644
--- a/samples/rust/Makefile
+++ b/samples/rust/Makefile
@@ -2,5 +2,6 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_RUST_MINIMAL) += rust_minimal.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_RUST_PRINT) += rust_print.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_DEVICE_TEST) += device.o
subdir-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_RUST_HOSTPROGS) += hostprogs
Then I enable this in menu config... compile the kernel e run this in a
qemu:
qemu-system-x86_64 -kernel bzImage -initrd initramfs.img -m 2G -machine
q35 -device ich9-ahci,id=sata -drive
id=disk,file=rootfs.img,if=none,format=raw -device
ide-hd,drive=disk,bus=sata.0 -append "root=/dev/sda console=ttyS0"
-nographic -monitor telnet:127.0.0.1:5555,server,nowai
the expected print is showing
[ 2.786174] device_test: initial device test
[ 2.786541] device_test: device created
Guilherme Giacomo Simoes (1):
rust: device: rename "Device::from_raw()"
rust/kernel/device.rs | 2 +-
rust/kernel/firmware.rs | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
Changes from v2:
- Refactored commit message style
Powered by blists - more mailing lists