[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ldz9uomz.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:50:28 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Fix missing put_device
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 15:55:39 +0100,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com> wrote:
>
> rzg2l_irqc_common_init calls of_find_device_by_node, but the
> corresponding put_device call is missing.
>
> Make sure we call put_device both when failing and when
> succeeding.
What sort of lifetime are you trying to enforce?
It looks to me that you'd be better off doing *one* device_put() right
after you have found the parent domain, but that completely depends on
the above.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists