[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zvra9mFa9vD30PGO@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:08:06 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, arnd@...db.de, bbrezillon@...nel.org,
boris.brezillon@...labora.com, conor.culhane@...vaco.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pthombar@...ence.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] MAINTAINERS: I3C: Add Frank Li as nxp I3C
controller driver maintainer
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 06:22:35PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Frank.li@....com wrote on Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:05:32 -0400:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 10:16:09AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > > Add Frank Li as NXP i3c controller driver as maintainer and add mail list
> > > imx@...ts.linux.dev for it.
> > >
> > > Add Frank Li as I3C subsystem reviewer.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Miquel:
> > Any comments?
>
> I guess we'll happily take your feedback on patches targeting the SVC
> driver, you've been working a lot on it. However, in general there has
> been a lot of discussions happening on your substantial patchsets and
> little to no convergence in the end.
I think this can't prevent no any feedback at this thread for more than
1 month.
Basic, this patch did two things, one add mail list imx@...ts.linux.dev to
keep us track all imx related patch in one mail list. generally, we don't
check linux-i3c mail list frequently.
The other things is add me to maintainer, If you have concern about it.
You'd better said as
- point to the path to be maintainer, such as do reviewer first for some
times.
- or simple reject this, I can post the patch, which only add
imx@...ts.linux.dev.
Keep simple, two questions:
1: are you agree on add imx@...ts.linux.dev?
2: are you agree on I as reviewer?
> I understand you want to push your
> patches upstream and I also want to make things move forward, but maybe
> one of the reasons for the stalls is the lack of fluent exchanges
> between us and the difficulty to explain bigger pictures in a clear
> way.
I agree on "the lack of fluent exchanges", No any i3c maintainer involve
my i3c target support discussion, even just said, it is "not good at all".
https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20240507204311.2898714-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com/
I post HCI issue/concern and not any feedback at all.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i3c/20240819-i3c_fix-v3-0-7d69f7b0a05e@nxp.com/T/#m16fa9bb875b0ae9d37c5f6e91f90e375551c6366
Frank
> I believe maintaining a subsystem still requires a bit more
> experience on this regard.
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists