linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: csum: Clean up recv_verify_packet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <66faf2363787a_18c93d294fe@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:47:18 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>, 
 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, 
 "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, 
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: csum: Clean up
 recv_verify_packet_ipv6

Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 9/30/24 13:16, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Sean Anderson wrote:
> >> Rename ip_len to payload_len since the length in this case refers only
> >> to the payload, and not the entire IP packet like for IPv4. While we're
> >> at it, just use the variable directly when calling
> >> recv_verify_packet_udp/tcp.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
> > 
> > Not sure such refactoring patches are worth the effort.
> 
> Well, FWIW you commented on this in your review, so I figured I'd send it.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/66dbb4fcbf560_2af86229423@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch/

True. I meant if respun.

Whether such changes are worth it as standalone patch is subjective.
And I get where you're coming from, given that thread.

Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>