[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240930220649.6954-1-okantumukluu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 01:06:49 +0300
From: Okan Tumuklu <okantumukluu@...il.com>
To: shuah@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Okan Tümüklü <117488504+Okan-tumuklu@...rs.noreply.github.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Update core.c
From: Okan Tümüklü <117488504+Okan-tumuklu@...rs.noreply.github.com>
1:The control flow was simplified by using else if statements instead of goto structure.
2:Error conditions are handled more clearly.
3:The device_unlock call at the end of the function is guaranteed in all cases.
---
net/nfc/core.c | 28 ++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/nfc/core.c b/net/nfc/core.c
index e58dc6405054..4e8f01145c37 100644
--- a/net/nfc/core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/core.c
@@ -40,27 +40,19 @@ int nfc_fw_download(struct nfc_dev *dev, const char *firmware_name)
if (dev->shutting_down) {
rc = -ENODEV;
- goto error;
- }
-
- if (dev->dev_up) {
+ }else if (dev->dev_up) {
rc = -EBUSY;
- goto error;
- }
-
- if (!dev->ops->fw_download) {
+ }else if (!dev->ops->fw_download) {
rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
- goto error;
- }
-
- dev->fw_download_in_progress = true;
- rc = dev->ops->fw_download(dev, firmware_name);
- if (rc)
- dev->fw_download_in_progress = false;
+ }else{
+ dev->fw_download_in_progress = true;
+ rc = dev->ops->fw_download(dev, firmware_name);
+ if (rc)
+ dev->fw_download_in_progress = false;
+ }
-error:
- device_unlock(&dev->dev);
- return rc;
+ device_unlock(&dev->dev);
+ return rc;
}
/**
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists