linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: resource: Skip IRQ override on Asus Vivobook Go E1404GAB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <38fc4bf7-804f-449b-a9a4-a33bb7486656@leemhuis.info>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:44:42 +0200
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Tamim Khan <tamim@...etak.com>,
 linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: resource: Skip IRQ override on Asus Vivobook Go
 E1404GAB

On 27.09.24 16:19, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 26-Sep-24 12:18 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 25.09.24 16:31, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> On 25-Sep-24 1:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1226760b-4699-4529-bf57-6423938157a3@wanadoo.fr/
>>> Ok, I wonder did you Cc me so that I can write / submit patches upstream
>>> for these ones?
>>
>> Not really. Of course it would be nice if you or someone else took care
>> of that one and...
>>
>>> It seems that there are 3 missing models:
>>> - E1404GA: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219224
>>> - X1704VAP https://lore.kernel.org/all/1226760b-4699-4529-bf57-6423938157a3@wanadoo.fr/
>>> - B2502CV: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217760#c12
>>>
>>> Which someone needs to submit upstream, right ?
>>
>> ...these as well -- and ideally would even be willing to act as go-to
>> person from now on in case more of these quirk entries are needed, which
>> I guess will be the case. But given the backstory (see below) I don't
>> think you or anyone else is obliged to do this, even if the current
>> situation is parlty caused by regressions and recent fixes for them.
> 
> I have already done a bunch of these patches. So I would be happy to
> submit more of these, but someone needs to bring them to my attention first.

Great, good to know.

> Also maybe Paul Menzel (added to the Cc) and Tamim Khan can help with
> adding more quirks, when reports come in ?

That would be great, but nevertheless allow me to ask:

Does anyone now if kernelnewbies has some place where we could submit
requests for creating quirk entries?

> Either way I have submitted a set of patches to add quirks for the 3 new
> known broken models now.

Many thx!

>> Writing this lead to another thought: does anyone have contacts to Asus
>> and could just ask if there is some generic way to detect which of their
>> Laptops need a quirk?
> I don't have any contacts at Asus.

I asked in the fediverse, maybe someone knows somebody that can help.
And if not: no harm done.

Have a nice week everyone!

Ciao, Thorsten