[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e93e1dd6-c215-4168-83e9-b8199599bc09@hqv.ch>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:41:58 +0200
From: Reto Schneider <rs@....ch>
To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, briannorris@...omium.org, kvalo@...nel.org,
francesco@...cini.it, tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com, s.hauer@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/22] wifi: nxpwifi: create nxpwifi to support iw61x
Hi David,
Answering here because an OEM proposed using the IW612 in an upcoming
product of my employer.
On 30.09.24 08:36, David Lin wrote:
> [1] We had considered adding IW61x to mwifiex, however due to FW
> architecture, host command interface and supported features are
> significantly different, doing this on mwifiex will carry a lot of
> burdens. The effort of making sure no regression is also a huge effort.
> We must create a new driver nxpwifi. Subsequent NXP chipsets will be
> added and sustained on nxpwifi only.
As developer, this sounds like a huge red flag. In the long-term
interest of my employer, I'd oppose using this type of hardware in our
products even if you manage to upstream the driver (as is).
Kind regards,
Reto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists