[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4620941.LvFx2qVVIh@diego>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:49:48 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Daniel Semkowicz <dse@...umatec.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...rry.de>
Cc: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>,
Farouk Bouabid <farouk.bouabid@...obroma-systems.com>,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...obroma-systems.com>,
Vahe Grigoryan <vahe.grigoryan@...obroma-systems.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add power button for RK3399 Puma
Hey Quentin, Daniel,
Am Donnerstag, 26. September 2024, 14:34:30 CEST schrieb Quentin Schulz:
> On 9/25/24 9:28 AM, Daniel Semkowicz wrote:
> > There is a PWRBTN# input pin exposed on a Q7 connector. The pin
> > is routed to a GPIO0_A1 through a diode. Q7 specification describes
> > the PWRBTN# pin as a Power Button signal.
> > Configure the pin as KEY_POWER, so it can function as power button and
> > trigger device shutdown.
> > Add the pin definition to RK3399 Puma dts, so it can be reused
> > by derived platforms, but keep it disabled by default.
> >
> > Enable the power button input on Haikou development board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Semkowicz <dse@...umatec.com>
>
> This works, thanks.
>
> Tested-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...rry.de>
>
> Now I have some questions I wasn't able to answer myself, maybe someone
> can provide some feedback on those :)
>
> We already have a gpio-keys for buttons on Haikou, c.f.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11/source/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma-haikou.dts#L22.
> Those signals are directly routed to the SoM and follow the Qseven standard.
>
> The same applies to PWRBTN# signal.
>
> However, here we have one gpio-keys for PWRBTN# in Puma DTSI and one
> gpio-keys for the buttons and sliders on Haikou devkit in Haikou DTS.
>
> I'm a bit undecided on where this should go.
>
> Having all button/slider signals following the Qseven standard in Puma
> DTSI and enable the gpio-keys only in the devkit would make sense to me,
> so that other baseboards could easily make use of it. However, things
> get complicated if the baseboard manufacturer decides to only implement
> **some** of the signals, for which we then need to remove some nodes
> from gpio-keys (and pinctrl entries) since gpio-keys doesn't check the
> "status" property in its child nodes (though that could be fixed). At
> which point, it's not entirely clear if having it in Puma DTSI is
> actually beneficial.
>
> Someone has an opinion/recommendation on that?
I guess from a platform perspective nobody really cares, so as that is
"your" board, it comes down to a policy decision on your part ;-) .
While pins follow the q7 standard, there may very well be some lax
handling of that standard in some places, and I guess gpio lines could
be re-used for something else if needed, as something like the lid-switch
is probably non-essential.
Also a gpio-key input does not create that much code-overhead if
replicated, so personally I'd just stick the power-button with the other
buttons in the haikou dts.
Which is also a way better thing than having multiple gpio-keys instances
that userspace then has to handle.
Heiko
> > ---
> >
> > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma-haikou.dts | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma-haikou.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma-haikou.dts
> > index f6f15946579e..0999026b16d0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma-haikou.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma-haikou.dts
> > @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ vddd_codec: vddd-codec {
> > };
> > };
> >
> > +&gpio_key_power {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > &hdmi {
> > ddc-i2c-bus = <&i2c3>;
> > status = "okay";
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi
> > index 650b1ba9c192..389ffe604e74 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> > * Copyright (c) 2017 Theobroma Systems Design und Consulting GmbH
> > */
> >
> > +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h>
> > #include "rk3399.dtsi"
> >
> > @@ -39,6 +40,19 @@ clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
> > #clock-cells = <0>;
> > };
> >
> > + gpio_key_power: gpio-key-power {
> > + compatible = "gpio-keys";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&pwrbtn_pin>;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > +
> > + button-pwrbtn-n {
> > + gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > + label = "PWRBTN#";
> > + linux,code = <KEY_POWER>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > vcc1v2_phy: vcc1v2-phy {
> > compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > regulator-name = "vcc1v2_phy";
> > @@ -475,6 +489,14 @@ &pinctrl {
> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > pinctrl-0 = <&q7_thermal_pin &bios_disable_override_hog_pin>;
> >
> > + buttons {
> > + pwrbtn_pin: pwrbtn-pin {
> > + rockchip,pins =
> > + /* PWRBTN# */
> > + <0 RK_PA1 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > gpios {
> > bios_disable_override_hog_pin: bios-disable-override-hog-pin {
> > rockchip,pins =
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists