linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: Handle threadirqs in __napi_schedule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240930095531.b_GDXzNb@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:55:31 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Handle threadirqs in __napi_schedule_irqoff

On 2024-09-13 12:19:05 [-0400], Sean Anderson wrote:
> It's in response to [1].
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240912084322.148d7fb2@kernel.org/

thanks

> > The forced-threaded interrupts run with disabled interrupts on !RT so
> > this change should not fix anything.
> 
> OK, so maybe this isn't necessary at all?

Based on your reasoning so far, yes, not needed.

> --Sean

Sebastian