linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 3/3] PCI/ASPM: Make pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state save both child and parent's L1SS configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <828d2fc0-e594-ad3e-b653-2c0acc1223b3@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:49:59 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@...lessos.org>
cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, 
    David Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>, 
    Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>, 
    Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@...ux.intel.com>, 
    Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
    LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux@...lessos.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/3] PCI/ASPM: Make pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state save
 both child and parent's L1SS configuration

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024, Jian-Hong Pan wrote:

> PCI devices' parameters on the VMD bus have been programmed properly
> originally. But, cleared after pci_reset_bus() and have not been restored
> correctly. This leads the link's L1.2 between PCIe Root Port and child
> device gets wrong configs.
> 
> Here is a failed example on ASUS B1400CEAE with enabled VMD. Both PCIe
> bridge and NVMe device should have the same LTR1.2_Threshold value.
> However, they are configured as different values in this case:
> 
> 10000:e0:06.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 11th Gen Core Processor PCIe Controller [8086:9a09] (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
>   ...
>   Capabilities: [200 v1] L1 PM Substates
>     L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1+ L1_PM_Substates+
>       PortCommonModeRestoreTime=45us PortTPowerOnTime=50us
>     L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
>       T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns
>     L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=0us
> 
> 10000:e1:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller [0108]: Sandisk Corp WD Blue SN550 NVMe SSD [15b7:5009] (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
>   ...
>   Capabilities: [900 v1] L1 PM Substates
>     L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1- L1_PM_Substates+
>       PortCommonModeRestoreTime=32us PortTPowerOnTime=10us
>     L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
>       T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=101376ns
>     L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=50us
> 
> Here is VMD mapped PCI device tree:
> 
> -+-[0000:00]-+-00.0  Intel Corporation Device 9a04
>  | ...
>  \-[10000:e0]-+-06.0-[e1]----00.0  Sandisk Corp WD Blue SN550 NVMe SSD
>               \-17.0  Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP SATA Controller
> 
> When pci_reset_bus() resets the bus [e1] of the NVMe, it only saves and
> restores NVMe's state before and after reset.

> The bus [e1] has only one
> NVMe device, so the NVMe's parent PCIe bridge is missed to be saved.

This is still misleading because "only one NVMe device" is not the 
reason why the parent's state is not saved.

> However, when it restores the NVMe's state, ASPM code restores L1SS for
> both the parent bridge and the NVMe in pci_restore_aspm_l1ss_state().
> Although the NVMe's L1SS is restored correctly, the parent bridge's L1SS is
> restored with a wrong value 0x0. Because, the parent bridge's L1SS was not

Again, please join these sentences.

> saved by pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state() before reset.
> 
> So, if the PCI device has a parent, make pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state() save
> the parent's L1SS configuration, too. This is symmetric on
> pci_restore_aspm_l1ss_state().
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/CAPpJ_eexU0gCHMbXw_z924WxXw0+B6SdS4eG9oGpEX1wmnMLkQ@mail.gmail.com/
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218394
> Fixes: 17423360a27a ("PCI/ASPM: Save L1 PM Substates Capability for suspend/resume")
> Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@...lessos.org>
> Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>

This tag should appear before signed-off-by.

> ---
> v9:
> - Drop the v8 fix about drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c. Use this in VMD instead.
> 
> v10:
> - Drop the v9 fix about drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> - Fix in PCIe ASPM to make it symmetric between pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state()
>   and pci_restore_aspm_l1ss_state()
> 
> v11:
> - Introduce __pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state as a resusable helper function
>   which is same as the original pci_configure_aspm_l1ss
> - Make pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state invoke __pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state for
>   both child and parent devices
> - Smooth the commit message
> 
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index bd0a8a05647e..17cdf372f7e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ void pci_configure_aspm_l1ss(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  			ERR_PTR(rc));
>  }
>  
> -void pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +static void __pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct pci_cap_saved_state *save_state;
>  	u16 l1ss = pdev->l1ss;
> @@ -101,6 +101,24 @@ void pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, l1ss + PCI_L1SS_CTL1, cap++);
>  }
>  
> +void pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *parent;
> +
> +	__pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(pdev);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * To be symmetric on pci_restore_aspm_l1ss_state(), save parent's L1
> +	 * substate configuration, if the parent has not saved state.
> +	 */
> +	if (!pdev->bus || !pdev->bus->self)
> +		return;
> +
> +	parent = pdev->bus->self;
> +	if (!parent->state_saved)
> +		__pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(parent);
> +}

The code change looks good!

-- 
 i.