[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8uuqazJTZE1M52at9uQiRHHr81vvt+p2jXLjSaweDCCKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:54:55 +0100
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] media: platform: rzg2l-cru: rzg2l-csi2: Make use
of rzg2l_csi2_formats array in rzg2l_csi2_enum_frame_size()
Hi Laurent,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 1:52 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 01:19:25PM +0100, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > Hi Laurent,
> >
> > Thank you for the review.
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 12:11 AM Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Prabhakar,
> > >
> > > Thank you for the patch.
> > >
> > > I've just noticed that the subject line of most of your patches is much
> > > longer than the 72 characters limit. Please try to shorten them. You can
> > > replace the prefixes with "media: rzg2l-cru:", and reword the subject
> > > lines that mention long function names.
> > >
> > Ok, I'll rework the subject line so that it fits within 72 characters.
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 06:53:55PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
> > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > > >
> > > > Make use `rzg2l_csi2_formats` array in rzg2l_csi2_enum_frame_size().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c | 5 ++++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > > > index 79d99d865c1f..e630283dd1f1 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > > > @@ -570,7 +570,10 @@ static int rzg2l_csi2_enum_frame_size(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > > struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state,
> > > > struct v4l2_subdev_frame_size_enum *fse)
> > > > {
> > > > - if (fse->index != 0)
> > > > + if (fse->index >= ARRAY_SIZE(rzg2l_csi2_formats))
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > Same comment as in 11/16. With this fixed,
> > >
> > Ok, I'll drop this check.
>
> Don't drop the check, drop the change. if (fse->index != 0) is the
> right check (testing > 0 works too).
>
Ahh sorry for not being clear, I meant I will drop the updated check.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists