linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/7] iio: adc: ad485x: add ad485x driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ee001d2-67d0-45ab-ae62-ce5b8dd7553e@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 09:08:25 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: "Miclaus, Antoniu" <Antoniu.Miclaus@...log.com>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen
 <lars@...afoo.de>, "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Sa, Nuno" <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>,
 Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
 Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
 "Schmitt, Marcelo" <Marcelo.Schmitt@...log.com>,
 João Paulo Gonçalves <joao.goncalves@...adex.com>,
 Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
 Dumitru Ceclan <mitrutzceclan@...il.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Alisa-Dariana Roman <alisadariana@...il.com>,
 "Cuciurean, Sergiu" <Sergiu.Cuciurean@...log.com>,
 "Bogdan, Dragos" <Dragos.Bogdan@...log.com>,
 "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] iio: adc: ad485x: add ad485x driver

On 10/1/24 8:51 AM, Miclaus, Antoniu wrote:
>>> Regarding the bulk writes/reads, the msb/mid/lsb registers need to be
>>> read/write in a specific order and the addresses are not incremental,
>>
>> We have _noinc() variants of regmap accessors.
> [Miclaus, Antoniu] 
> I think _noinc() functions read from the same register address so it doesn't
> apply.
> I am reading values from multiple register addresses that are not reg_addr,
> reg_addr+1, reg_addr+2.

I'm confused by the statement that the registers are not incremental.

For example, this patch defines...

+#define AD485X_REG_CHX_OFFSET_LSB(ch)	AD485X_REG_CHX_OFFSET(ch)
+#define AD485X_REG_CHX_OFFSET_MID(ch)	(AD485X_REG_CHX_OFFSET_LSB(ch) + 0x01)
+#define AD485X_REG_CHX_OFFSET_MSB(ch)	(AD485X_REG_CHX_OFFSET_MID(ch) + 0x01)

This looks exactly like reg_addr, reg_addr+1, reg_addr+2 to me.

> 
>>> so I am not sure how the bulk functions fit. On this matter, we will need
>>> unsigned int (not u8) to store the values read via regmap_read, and in this
>>> case we will need extra casts and assignments to use get_unaligned.
>>
>> --
>> With Best Regards,
>> Andy Shevchenko
>>
>