linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2/2] clk: samsung: Fixes PLL locktime for PLL142XX used on FSD platfom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <009601db1406$a8f5ec50$fae1c4f0$@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 19:04:34 +0530
From: "Varada Pavani" <v.pavani@...sung.com>
To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzk@...nel.org>, <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	<cw00.choi@...sung.com>, <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <aswani.reddy@...sung.com>, <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
	<gost.dev@...sung.com>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] clk: samsung: Fixes PLL locktime for PLL142XX used
 on FSD platfom



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzk@...nel.org]
> Sent: 30 September 2024 18:05
> To: Varada Pavani <v.pavani@...sung.com>; s.nawrocki@...sung.com;
> cw00.choi@...sung.com; alim.akhtar@...sung.com;
> mturquette@...libre.com; sboyd@...nel.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@...r.kernel.org; linux-clk@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: aswani.reddy@...sung.com; pankaj.dubey@...sung.com;
> gost.dev@...sung.com; stable@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: samsung: Fixes PLL locktime for PLL142XX used
> on FSD platfom
> 
> On 30/09/2024 13:18, Varada Pavani wrote:
> > Add PLL locktime for PLL142XX controller.
> >
> 
> So you send the same? Or something new? Please provide proper changelog
> and mark patches as v2/v3 or RESEND.
> 
> But anyway this cannot be RESEND as I explicitly asked for fixing.
> 
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 
> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and either
> implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.
> 
> Thank you.
> </form letter>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Sorry, have sent the same patch again. As I need to post one patch alone which got
missed due to internal technical issue. Next time onwards will make sure to mark the
patches as V2/V3 or RESEND accordingly.

Regards,
Varada Pavani