[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <576B115A-CB36-4795-BF23-75EACD0679E5@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 17:16:55 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, quic_mahap@...cinc.com,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
CC: Kalyan Thota <quic_kalyant@...cinc.com>,
Jayaprakash Madisetty <quic_jmadiset@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Display enablement changes for Qualcomm SA8775P platform
On October 1, 2024 1:16:31 PM GMT+03:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>On 01/10/2024 08:41, Mahadevan via B4 Relay wrote:
>> This series introduces support to enable the Mobile Display Subsystem (MDSS)
>> and Display Processing Unit (DPU) for the Qualcomm SA8775P target. It
>> includes the addition of the hardware catalog, compatible string,
>> relevant device tree changes, and their YAML bindings.
>>
>> ---
>> In this series PATCH 5: "arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: add display dt nodes for MDSS0 and DPU"
>> depends on the clock enablement change:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-sa8775p-mm-v3-v1-0-77d53c3c0cef@quicinc.com/
>>
>
>b4 diff fails. b4 mbox + b4 diff -m also fail. Way to make reviewers
>life more difficult than it should be.
>
>I'll move this patchset to the bottom of the queue. Please in the future
>send patches in standard way, so our tools can handle it easily.
This is the first time I read that using b4 tool is a strong requirement. This iteration has been sent using b4, previous, probably, were not.
>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists