[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93b3d510-f21b-4f89-ae53-0fa50f03a42d@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 09:12:32 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/27] x86/cea: Export per CPU variable
cea_exception_stacks
On 9/30/24 22:00, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
> The per CPU variable cea_exception_stacks contains per CPU stacks for
> NMI, #DB and #DF, which is referenced in KVM to set host FRED RSP[123]
> each time a vCPU is loaded onto a CPU, thus it needs to be exported.
Nit: It's not obvious how 'cea_exception_stacks' get used in this
series. It's never referenced explicitly.
I did figure it out by looking for 'RSP[123]' references, but a much
better changelog would be something like:
The per CPU array 'cea_exception_stacks' points to per CPU
stacks for NMI, #DB and #DF. It is normally referenced via the
#define: __this_cpu_ist_top_va().
FRED introduced new fields in the host-state area of the VMCS
for stack levels 1->3 (HOST_IA32_FRED_RSP[123]). KVM must
populate these each time a vCPU is loaded onto a CPU.
See how that explicitly gives the reader greppable strings for
"__this_cpu_ist_top_va" and "HOST_IA32_FRED_RSP"? That makes it much
easier to figure out what is going on.
I was also momentarily confused about why these loads need to be done on
_every_ vCPU load. I think it's because the host state can change as
the vCPU moves around to different physical CPUs and
__this_cpu_ist_top_va() can and will change. But it's a detail that I
think deserves to be explained in the changelog. There is also this
note in vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs():
> /*
> * Linux uses per-cpu TSS and GDT, so set these when switching
> * processors. See 22.2.4.
> */
which makes me think that it might not be bad to pull *all* of the
per-cpu VMCS field population code out into a helper since the reasoning
of why these need to be repopulated is identical.
Also, what's the purpose of clearing GUEST_IA32_FRED_RSP[123] at
init_vmcs() time? I would have thought that those values wouldn't
matter until the VMCS gets loaded at vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs() when they are
overwritten anyway. Or, I could be just totally misunderstanding how
KVM consumes the VMCS. :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists