lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR11MB567885FD8899DA83FB95DE61C9772@SJ0PR11MB5678.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 16:58:33 +0000
From: "Sridhar, Kanchana P" <kanchana.p.sridhar@...el.com>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "hannes@...xchg.org"
	<hannes@...xchg.org>, "nphamcs@...il.com" <nphamcs@...il.com>,
	"chengming.zhou@...ux.dev" <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
	"usamaarif642@...il.com" <usamaarif642@...il.com>, "shakeel.butt@...ux.dev"
	<shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, "ryan.roberts@....com" <ryan.roberts@....com>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, "21cnbao@...il.com"
	<21cnbao@...il.com>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>, "Zou, Nanhai"
	<nanhai.zou@...el.com>, "Feghali, Wajdi K" <wajdi.k.feghali@...el.com>,
	"Gopal, Vinodh" <vinodh.gopal@...el.com>, "Sridhar, Kanchana P"
	<kanchana.p.sridhar@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 6/7] mm: zswap: Support large folios in zswap_store().

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 11:00 PM
> To: Sridhar, Kanchana P <kanchana.p.sridhar@...el.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-mm@...ck.org;
> hannes@...xchg.org; nphamcs@...il.com; chengming.zhou@...ux.dev;
> usamaarif642@...il.com; shakeel.butt@...ux.dev; ryan.roberts@....com;
> Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>; 21cnbao@...il.com; akpm@...ux-
> foundation.org; willy@...radead.org; Zou, Nanhai <nanhai.zou@...el.com>;
> Feghali, Wajdi K <wajdi.k.feghali@...el.com>; Gopal, Vinodh
> <vinodh.gopal@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/7] mm: zswap: Support large folios in zswap_store().
> 
> [..]
> > > >  store_failed:
> > > >         zpool_free(entry->pool->zpool, entry->handle);
> > > > -put_pool:
> > > > -       zswap_pool_put(entry->pool);
> > > > -freepage:
> > > > +put_pool_objcg:
> > > > +       zswap_pool_put(pool);
> > > > +       obj_cgroup_put(objcg);
> > >
> > > I think if we reorder the function we can drop these calls, make the
> > > comments positioned a bit better, and centralize the entry
> > > initializations. I am also not a fan of passing a semi-initialized
> > > entry to zswap_compress() to get the pool pointer.
> > >
> > > Does the following diff improve things or did I miss something?
> >
> > We shouldn’t be adding the entry to the xarray before initializing its pool
> > and objcg, right? Please let me know if I am misunderstanding what you're
> > proposing in the diff.
> 
> It should be safe. We already initialize entry->lru after we insert
> the entry in the tree. See the comment above the call to
> zswap_lru_add(). Basically we are protected against concurrent
> stores/loads through the folio lock, and are protected against
> writeback because the entry is not on the LRU yet.

Thanks for the clarification, Yosry. Since this is a change in the entry
initialization wrt the mainline, is it Ok if this is done in a follow-up patch?

Thanks,
Kanchana

> 
> >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
> > > index b74c8de996468..eac1f846886a6 100644
> > > --- a/mm/zswap.c
> > > +++ b/mm/zswap.c
> > > @@ -881,7 +881,8 @@ static int zswap_cpu_comp_dead(unsigned int
> cpu,
> > > struct hlist_node *node)
> > >         return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static bool zswap_compress(struct page *page, struct zswap_entry
> *entry)
> > > +static bool zswap_compress(struct page *page, struct zswap_entry
> *entry,
> > > +                          struct zswap_pool *pool)
> > >  {
> > >         struct crypto_acomp_ctx *acomp_ctx;
> > >         struct scatterlist input, output;
> > > @@ -893,7 +894,7 @@ static bool zswap_compress(struct page *page,
> > > struct zswap_entry *entry)
> > >         gfp_t gfp;
> > >         u8 *dst;
> > >
> > > -       acomp_ctx = raw_cpu_ptr(entry->pool->acomp_ctx);
> > > +       acomp_ctx = raw_cpu_ptr(pool->acomp_ctx);
> > >
> > >         mutex_lock(&acomp_ctx->mutex);
> > >
> > > @@ -926,7 +927,7 @@ static bool zswap_compress(struct page *page,
> > > struct zswap_entry *entry)
> > >         if (comp_ret)
> > >                 goto unlock;
> > >
> > > -       zpool = entry->pool->zpool;
> > > +       zpool = pool->zpool;
> > >         gfp = __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN |
> __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM;
> > >         if (zpool_malloc_support_movable(zpool))
> > >                 gfp |= __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_MOVABLE;
> > > @@ -1435,23 +1436,11 @@ static bool zswap_store_page(struct page
> > > *page,
> > >         entry = zswap_entry_cache_alloc(GFP_KERNEL,
> > > folio_nid(page_folio(page)));
> > >         if (!entry) {
> > >                 zswap_reject_kmemcache_fail++;
> > > -               goto reject;
> > > +               return false;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > -       /* zswap_store() already holds a ref on 'objcg' and 'pool' */
> > > -       if (objcg)
> > > -               obj_cgroup_get(objcg);
> > > -       zswap_pool_get(pool);
> > > -
> > > -       /* if entry is successfully added, it keeps the reference */
> > > -       entry->pool = pool;
> > > -
> > > -       if (!zswap_compress(page, entry))
> > > -               goto put_pool_objcg;
> > > -
> > > -       entry->swpentry = page_swap_entry(page);
> > > -       entry->objcg = objcg;
> > > -       entry->referenced = true;
> > > +       if (!zswap_compress(page, entry, pool))
> > > +               goto compress_failed;
> > >
> > >         old = xa_store(tree, swp_offset(entry->swpentry), entry,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> > >         if (xa_is_err(old)) {
> > > @@ -1470,6 +1459,16 @@ static bool zswap_store_page(struct page
> *page,
> > >         if (old)
> > >                 zswap_entry_free(old);
> > >
> > > +       /*
> > > +        * The entry is successfully compressed and stored in the tree, there
> is
> > > +        * no further possibility of failure. Grab refs to the pool and objcg.
> > > +        * These refs will be dropped by zswap_entry_free() when the entry
> is
> > > +        * removed from the tree.
> > > +        */
> > > +       zswap_pool_get(pool);
> > > +       if (objcg)
> > > +               obj_cgroup_get(objcg);
> > > +
> > >         /*
> > >          * We finish initializing the entry while it's already in xarray.
> > >          * This is safe because:
> > > @@ -1480,26 +1479,22 @@ static bool zswap_store_page(struct page
> > > *page,
> > >          *    The publishing order matters to prevent writeback from seeing
> > >          *    an incoherent entry.
> > >          */
> 
> I am referring to the comment here ^
> 
> > > +       entry->pool = pool;
> > > +       entry->swpentry = page_swap_entry(page);
> > > +       entry->objcg = objcg;
> > > +       entry->referenced = true;
> > >         if (entry->length) {
> > >                 *compressed_bytes += entry->length;
> > >                 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->lru);
> > >                 zswap_lru_add(&zswap_list_lru, entry);
> > >         }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ