[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66fc57ef.050a0220.27e956.af8d@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 22:13:33 +0200
From: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@...il.com>
To: rafael@...nel.org
Cc: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix reference count on CPU node
On dt., de set. 17 2024, Miquel Sabaté Solà wrote:
> For the qcom-spm driver, an early return was not calling the proper
> of_node_put call for a previously acquired device node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c
> index 1fc9968eae19..d3608f47d02b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c
> @@ -96,8 +96,10 @@ static int spm_cpuidle_register(struct device *cpuidle_dev, int cpu)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> saw_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "qcom,saw", 0);
> - if (!saw_node)
> + if (!saw_node) {
> + of_node_put(cpu_node);
> return -ENODEV;
> + }
>
> pdev = of_find_device_by_node(saw_node);
> of_node_put(saw_node);
Gently ping for a fix in the same spirit as [1].
Could you take a look whenever you have some time?
Thanks!
Miquel
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240917134246.584026-1-mikisabate@gmail.com/
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (862 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists