[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKudn0WcOAg89ouTQoEHQC5n90SdetxHYG7GvQWmWo6WQ5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 21:20:41 +0000
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Neal Gompa <neal@...pa.dev>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Asahi Linux <asahi@...ts.linux.dev>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/20] gendwarfksyms: Expand structure types
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 2:16 PM Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/23/24 20:18, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > +static void process_variant_type(struct state *state, struct die *cache,
> > + Dwarf_Die *die)
> > +{
> > + process_list_comma(state, cache);
> > + process(cache, "variant {");
> > + process_linebreak(cache, 1);
> > + check(process_die_container(state, cache, die, process_type,
> > + match_member_type));
> > + process_linebreak(cache, -1);
> > + process(cache, "}");
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void process_variant_part_type(struct state *state, struct die *cache,
> > + Dwarf_Die *die)
> > +{
> > + process_list_comma(state, cache);
> > + process(cache, "variant_part {");
> > + process_linebreak(cache, 1);
> > + check(process_die_container(state, cache, die, process_type,
> > + match_variant_type));
> > + process_linebreak(cache, -1);
> > + process(cache, "}");
> > +}
>
> For variant types, should the tool worry also about DW_AT_discr and
> DW_AT_discr_value?
Hmm, I initially thought they were not necessary, but looking at the
rustc DWARF output a bit more closely, it might actually be a good
idea to include this information. I'll add these both, although since
DW_AT_discr just points to a member DIE, it's probably enough to just
process all child DIEs for the variant_part instead of limiting
ourselves to variants only.
> > +static void process_unspecified_type(struct state *state, struct die *cache,
> > + Dwarf_Die *die)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * These can be emitted for stand-elone assembly code, which means we
> > + * might run into them in vmlinux.o.
> > + */
>
> Nit: stand-elone -> stand-alone.
Oops, I'll fix this too. Thanks!
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists