[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241001225207.2215639-5-andrii@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:52:06 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
To: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org,
oleg@...hat.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org,
willy@...radead.org,
surenb@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
mjguzik@...il.com,
brauner@...nel.org,
jannh@...gle.com,
mhocko@...nel.org,
vbabka@...e.cz,
mingo@...nel.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 tip/perf/core 4/5] uprobes: simplify find_active_uprobe_rcu() VMA checks
At the point where find_active_uprobe_rcu() is used we know that VMA in
question has triggered software breakpoint, so we don't need to validate
vma->vm_flags. Keep only vma->vm_file NULL check.
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index a2e6a57f79f2..7bd9111b4e8b 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -2091,7 +2091,7 @@ static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe_rcu(unsigned long bp_vaddr, int *is_swb
mmap_read_lock(mm);
vma = vma_lookup(mm, bp_vaddr);
if (vma) {
- if (valid_vma(vma, false)) {
+ if (vma->vm_file) {
struct inode *inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file);
loff_t offset = vaddr_to_offset(vma, bp_vaddr);
--
2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists