[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66fb882e.7b0a0220.1118d5.90ca@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 07:27:08 +0200
From: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@...il.com>
To: rafael@...nel.org
Cc: viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Avoid a bad reference count on CPU node
On dt., de set. 17 2024, Miquel Sabaté Solà wrote:
> In the parse_perf_domain function, if the call to
> of_parse_phandle_with_args returns an error, then the reference to the
> CPU device node that was acquired at the start of the function would not
> be properly decremented.
>
> Address this by declaring the variable with the __free(device_node)
> cleanup attribute.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index d4d2f4d1d7cb..aabec598f79a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -1113,10 +1113,9 @@ static inline int parse_perf_domain(int cpu, const char *list_name,
> const char *cell_name,
> struct of_phandle_args *args)
> {
> - struct device_node *cpu_np;
> int ret;
>
> - cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> + struct device_node *cpu_np __free(device_node) = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> if (!cpu_np)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -1124,9 +1123,6 @@ static inline int parse_perf_domain(int cpu, const char *list_name,
> args);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> -
> - of_node_put(cpu_np);
> -
> return 0;
> }
Gently ping :)
Do you have some time to take a look at this fix?
Thanks,
Miquel
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (862 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists