linux-kernel - Re: Question about config UPROBES and UPROBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10d33d7f-5785-93e1-128d-5ad6ac2e771f@loongson.cn>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 14:30:33 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about config UPROBES and UPROBE_EVENTS

On 9/30/24 23:43, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:32:31 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 00:28:13 +0900
>> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:06:30 -0400
>>> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:33:42 +0800
>>>> Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>>>>    
>>>>>> the CONFIG_UPROBES is disabled by default and make CONFIG_UPROBE_EVENTS
>>>>>> depending on it, the uprobe_events menu is hidden. I don't like this.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is somehow like the current status of CONFIG_KPROBES and
>>>>> CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS.
>>>>
>>>> The question is, can uprobes be used without uprobe_events? With the
>>>> current BPF work that I haven't been following, it may be possible now.
>>>
>>> uprobe_register/unregister APIs are exposed to the kernel modules,
>>> since systemtap had been introduced this feature.
>>>
>>
>> OK, but since they have always been visible, I would just make
>> CONFIG_UPROBES a normal option and CONFIG_UPROBE_EVENTS select it if it
>> gets selected, and not depend on it.
> 
> Agreed.

Thanks very much for your discussions. I agree with you.

Then, CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS should depend on or select CONFIG_KPROBES?
In the current code, CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS depend on CONFIG_KPROBES,
the CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS menu is hidden if CONFIG_KPROBES is not set.

Thanks,
Tiezhu