[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2957b59e-25f4-4510-9053-8ad5067a60e5@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 17:50:12 -0700
From: "Manwaring, Derek" <derekmn@...zon.com>
To: <david.kaplan@....com>
CC: <bp@...en8.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<jpoimboe@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 21/34] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for mds
On 2024-09-12 14:08-0500 David Kaplan wrote:
> @@ -446,7 +450,8 @@ static void __init mds_apply_mitigation(void)
> if (mds_mitigation == MDS_MITIGATION_FULL) {
> setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF);
> if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_BUG_MSBDS_ONLY) &&
> - (mds_nosmt || cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt()))
> + (mds_nosmt || cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt() ||
> + cpu_mitigate_attack_vector(CPU_MITIGATE_CROSS_THREAD)))
> cpu_smt_disable(false);
> }
> }
Maybe I'm missing something here - if you care about user/user, why
would you not care about cross-thread? It seems to me SMT should be
turned off for all of the vectors.
Derek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists